Pave Middle Path
Staff Editorial
Issue date: 4/30/09 Section: Opinion
Yesterday morning, a construction crew began the process of paving the two paths connecting Middle Path and College Road. Conversations across campus-and through all-student emails-turned quickly to the issue of whether Middle Path should be paved as well. It is our belief that it should be.
Middle Path is a large part of what defines Kenyon. The argument that paving Middle Path would somehow rob Kenyon of its uniqueness, or even meaningfully change the character of the path itself, represents a misunderstanding of what Middle Path does for Kenyon. What influences Kenyon's campus culture in a fundamental way is the fact that our campus is united by one practically unavoidable pedestrian highway. Middle Path isn't special because it's unpaved; it's special because it represents a guarantee that even on your busiest day at Kenyon, you'll be sure to see almost everyone you know at least once. As small a college town as Gambier may be, Middle Path makes it smaller. It would take much more than a cement truck to change that.
There are those who argue that such sweeping changes in the campus aesthetic, and the financial commitment they would represent, are disproportionate to the need of the two disabled members of next year's incoming class. To this we say that we hope the College's accessibility goals are not to make life in Gambier merely tolerable for the few individuals willing to brave less-than-ideal conditions. Instead of dismissing concerns about accessibility by arguing that disabled students who chose to attend Kenyon knew what they were signing up for, we should aim to inhabit a campus that gives more disabled students a reason to sign up.
On the aesthetic point, critics of plans to pave Middle Path should note that a paved Middle Path doesn't have to look like a New York City sidewalk. The path can be paved to look like gravel-more so, if desired, than the current stone paths leading to Olin Library and to the Science Quad.
It is not our opinion that Kenyon traditions are overrated. We simply believe that the tradition of Middle Path is not one that would be meaningfully compromised by making it more accessible to all present and future members of the Kenyon community.
Middle Path is a large part of what defines Kenyon. The argument that paving Middle Path would somehow rob Kenyon of its uniqueness, or even meaningfully change the character of the path itself, represents a misunderstanding of what Middle Path does for Kenyon. What influences Kenyon's campus culture in a fundamental way is the fact that our campus is united by one practically unavoidable pedestrian highway. Middle Path isn't special because it's unpaved; it's special because it represents a guarantee that even on your busiest day at Kenyon, you'll be sure to see almost everyone you know at least once. As small a college town as Gambier may be, Middle Path makes it smaller. It would take much more than a cement truck to change that.
There are those who argue that such sweeping changes in the campus aesthetic, and the financial commitment they would represent, are disproportionate to the need of the two disabled members of next year's incoming class. To this we say that we hope the College's accessibility goals are not to make life in Gambier merely tolerable for the few individuals willing to brave less-than-ideal conditions. Instead of dismissing concerns about accessibility by arguing that disabled students who chose to attend Kenyon knew what they were signing up for, we should aim to inhabit a campus that gives more disabled students a reason to sign up.
On the aesthetic point, critics of plans to pave Middle Path should note that a paved Middle Path doesn't have to look like a New York City sidewalk. The path can be paved to look like gravel-more so, if desired, than the current stone paths leading to Olin Library and to the Science Quad.
It is not our opinion that Kenyon traditions are overrated. We simply believe that the tradition of Middle Path is not one that would be meaningfully compromised by making it more accessible to all present and future members of the Kenyon community.

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 15
Sir Psychedelia
posted 4/30/09 @ 6:10 PM EST
If anyone had an ounce of respect for Collegian before this article... they've lost it now.
spencer
posted 4/30/09 @ 6:23 PM EST
As a graduate of Kenyon, I would be sad to see Middle Path paved. Gambier should remain a rural town and Kenyon a rural college. Paving Middle Path is chipping away at the Gothic beauty of the school. (Continued…)
Alum Class of 2000
posted 5/01/09 @ 8:25 AM EST
As an alum that spent time on crutches at Kenyon (twice) and an individual who works with people with disabilities, I am proud to see that the College has entered the real world and the 21st Century. (Continued…)
Anon
posted 5/01/09 @ 3:31 PM EST
Alum, thank you for the thoughtful and insightful post. Personally, I'm thrilled to say I was here when Kenyon took its baby steps out of the stone age. (Continued…)
Robert
posted 5/02/09 @ 8:25 PM EST
Pave the path and--ever so slightly--the college becomes less remarkable. It's that simple. The question is, is it worthwhile? Talking about diversity is a fine thing, but, until the college decreases it's heavy tuition dependency Kenyon won't be a diverse place. (Continued…)
Outside looking in
posted 5/03/09 @ 2:17 PM EST
I never went to Kenyon, but a really close friend of mine did- and all she talked about was how amazing the school is and how it's nothing like other colleges. (Continued…)
LM
posted 5/05/09 @ 8:43 AM EST
Really, Sir Psychadelia[sic]?
Because from the way you've been commenting, it seems like you're pretty gung-ho about that gravel.
Sir Psychedelia
posted 5/05/09 @ 5:19 PM EST
PsychAdelia is a dirty impostor... can't you tell by how (s)he spelled my name wrong?
Joe M. Ama
posted 5/06/09 @ 1:51 AM EST
Yeah!
My favorite part of Kenyon is that after someone who runs the only paper on campus writes an editorial about a rather obscure idea, they get to do it again the very next week!
And while we're at it, I think that we should make all the doors automatic with electric eyes. (Continued…)
ano
posted 5/07/09 @ 7:46 PM EST
Terrible editorial, terrible analysis, terrible newspaper.
Post a Comment